I am very against naming things as volcanic for very little reason and Pret have now fallen into this caldera. I am yet to try their vitamin volcano smoothie nor have I ever drank from a volcano but having drank smoothies and studied volcanoes I can imagine that they are in no way similar. Why did they feel it was apt to label their product as a volcano, was it simply for alliterative purposes? Was it because like the smoothie the soils that surround volcanoes are often nutrient rich (in which case well done Pret)? Also the volcano depicted on the bottle IS CLEARLY more then 45degrees so I don't know what the hell they were thinking. But you can check out nutritional information here! But maybe I should just be happy that the nation has taken volcanoes to its heart. Let me know what you think.
Also neither of the hideous clubs have anything to do with Volcano Club shit and even shitter. I thoroughly apologise if anyone has been misled on any occasion.
Thursday 28 July 2011
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Hopefully the latter won't show up on this work computer, Hadrian
ReplyDeletethe latter club I meant to write
ReplyDeleteBeware the Ronald Macdonald volcano burger is on it's way!
ReplyDeleteI think there is something in Withington that has a volcano pizza, which is just spicy. That's another thing I hate - calling spicy things volcanic, no volcanoes are not spicy if you ate one it would probably just burn your throat in a very slow and painful manner due to the viscosity of lava (but with added ash).
ReplyDeletePizza Express have a pizza called Etna which is spicy but I guess Etna is greek for 'I burn'
ReplyDelete